Subscribe by Email

Your email:

RRP Documentation Forms

The Contractor Coaching Partnership Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

EPA RRP Enforcement Extension For Contractor Compliance Ends

  
  
  
  

The June 18th EPA RRP Enforcement  extension date came to a close on Thursday, 9/30/2010. As you may recall, the EPA determined in June, that it was necessary to allow contractors, property owners and maintenance workers more time to obtain RRP training and certification. Reasons given were lack of accredited trainers, awareness and available classes. The extension called for the EPA to forgo enforcement of the firm certification until 9/30/2010. In addition, the extension stated that contractors must prove that they have signed up for RRP training by 9/30/2010 and that training must be completed on or before 12/31/2010.

EPA           Certified Firm           Certified Renovator Course Manual

What does this mean for those who are non-compliant?

Contractors who have failed to apply for the Firm Certification  cannot legally work on homes built before 1978, if they are projects subject to the EPA RRP Lead Rule. In addition, if they do work on a home prior to 1978, they must use lead safe practices and produce the required documentation taught in the certified renovator training. Fines for non-compliance are up to $37,500 per violation per day.

If I work on a pre 1978 home and I am not trained, how will they catch me?

The above question comes up everyday in my office. We receive calls from those who believe that the EPA will never enforce this regulation. These non-compliant minded contractors say the EPA doesn't have the resources, no one knows about the law, it is just a money grab and several other reasons to vulgar to print here.

EPA's secret weapon written into the law; documentation

The EPA acknowledges that they have challenges with awareness and the resources to enforce this law on a widespread basis. However, the EPA RRP Lead Rule has an enforcement mechanism built in that all non-compliant contractors, property owners and maintenance workers should know. The law states that renovators must document the lead-safe practices used on pre 1978 properties. This documentation MUST be kept on file for three years. 

This mechanism will allow any EPA or government official to go back three years on work preformed by a contractor on a pre 1978 home. Any government agency can initiate the enforcement. For example, let's say OSHA visits you and they find RRP violations. They can initiate RRP enforcement actions by calling the EPA. We see evidence of this in Massachusetts where each agency will help the other with enforcement. Last week, I spoke with the EPA in New York and I was told that they are asking the county offices to report RRP violators and EPA inspections will follow.

So in essence, a contractor may think they are OK because no one from the EPA is assigned to their area. However, the EPA may 2 years down the road, when they have more resources, ask to see your documents for work done on a 1900 home. If you don't have them you are assumed to be non-compliant. Remember the fine is up to $37,500 per violation per day. In regulated states like Massachusetts, documentation requirements are similar, the fines may be less, but violations can be revocation of license to work.

How many more need to be trained

To date the EPA estimates that 475,000 people have been trained and we are fast approaching 300 trainers. Industry trainers we work with cite that this represents 10% of all who need to become trained. The EPA believes this extension has provided the remaining 90% sufficient time to plan their affairs accordingly to become compliant.

Those who must comply with this law are general contractors, remodelers, roofers, painters, siding and window contractors, gutter installers, weatherization firms, maintenance workers, property management firms, owner of multi-family properties where they receive rent, banks and trusts who own real estate for sale like foreclosures, Realtors who oversee renovations on pre-1978 homes, municipalities, colleges and universities with housing, flooring companies, interior designers who work with wall coverings, architects who contract renovation projects, tile contractors, handymen, insulation contractors, alarm companies, cable and fiber optic installers, HVAC, plumbers, finish mill work and carpentry and anyone working on pre 1978 homes, target housing and day care centers for compensation where they will break paint in the amount of 6 square feet per room on the interior and 20 square feet on the exterior.

Do you know anyone described in the above list? Ask them if they are certified and RRP trained. You may save them from fines of up to $37,500 per violation per day?

mark the coach

EPA RRP Training

RRP Workshops  

mark the coach

Contractor Business Coaching    Design/Build Training

Fall Protection Training  RRP Training  Safety Manual Workshops  

Comments

Mark, 
I realize your blog allows anyone in cyberspace to read it and every contractor should add it to their "must read" list, but, unless I am mistaken, you are principally talking to Massachusetts contractors, so it might be helpful to explain again the ramifications of the Massachusetts Department of Occupational Safety being the managing authority for the RRP law in Massachusetts. My understanding is that even if you are a company that has been certified by the EPA; if that company or individual working as a DBA, has not received a waiver from MA DOS, you are not legally allowed to work in pre-78 buildings where lead is present in the work area. As of today there are only 250 companies on the MA DOS Currently Licensed Renovation, Repair and Painting Contractors list. That makes the number of contractors non-compliant even greater.  
If you are a contractor who has not filed for EPA certification, don't bother, because you are now required to apply for certification through MA DOS. Here is a link to the application: http://www.mass.gov/Elwd/docs//dos/lead_asbestos/lead/la-app_rc.pdf 
If you have received your companies EPA NAT number then you should apply for the MA DOS waiver by filing this form with them. Here is the waiver link: http://www.mass.gov/Elwd/docs/dos/lead_asbestos/lead/la-app_lsrcwaiver.pdf  
For anyone reading this, you may want to go back and read Mark's previous postings to have a better understanding of implications of MA DOS being the regulating authority. 
As one of the 250 companies that has received a waiver, it amazes me that all "responsible" contractors have not become certified and have not implemented the RRP protocols when required. It the right thing to do for your employees, clients and their neighbors. 
 
Posted @ Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:15 PM by Richard Berry
Hello Richard, 
 
This post is more for the general audience however I have included Mass as an example of how the Mass Department of Safety is working with OSHA on enforcement and the similarities with the EPA on documentation. 
 
Thank you for the "must read" endorsement. I will put up another post this week specifically for Mass RRP. 
 
The readers of this blog are coming from every state in the country. My blog and website are getting over thousand hits a week. When training was hopping this spring it was over two thousand a week. I am amazed where the traffic is coming from. Thanks for sharing and hope to hear from you soon. 
 
Posted @ Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:33 PM by Mark Paskell
this is going to be an interesting ride, I wonder how many companies will be nailed after 3 years. All legal contractor's need to blow in the Illegal contractors on Jan 1st. all you need to do is look at your local advertising and cross reference to the EPA's certified firm list, then report them. also I have told local advertising companies about all the non certified contractors they advertise, however I don't think they care, maybe they should be held accountable for their negligence !!!! peace TOM
Posted @ Sunday, October 03, 2010 9:50 PM by Tom L>
driving a cab looooks sooo good thank you obama
Posted @ Monday, October 11, 2010 1:31 PM by paul k
Common Paul, 
 
 
 
Is it really that bad? 
 
We are surviviors. 
 
Why let the annoited one and his comrades tell us what is best for us. Let's figure out how to deal with it, innovate and keep a positive outlook. I agree it will not be easy however I am seeing contractors figure this out everyday and they are making the transition successfully. The key is an attitude that they will propel you forward in spite of the obstacles. Please read the story above on how a contractor won a job due to RRP. Frank is an average guy who would beleived that he could use this as an opportunity to win. He did.
Posted @ Monday, October 11, 2010 1:55 PM by Mark Paskell
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics